Educational Psychology: An Exploration of Learning and Teaching

Introduction

Educational psychology is a branch of psychology devoted to understanding the scientific study of human learning. The discipline involves the examination of teaching methods, student behaviour, and the psychological processes that underpin learning. This article explores the development of the human brain, teaching techniques, prevalent learning theories, contemporary studies and research in teaching and learning, and the role of technologies in enhancing learning. It also delves into the intriguing topics of manipulation, deep relaxation, neurofeedback, hypnosis, and self-hypnosis in learning.

 

The Development of the Human Brain

The human brain undergoes an intricate and protracted developmental process, starting from the prenatal period extending well into early adulthood. Neuroscientific research has shown that the brain is a complex, adaptive system that changes in response to learning (Blakemore and Frith, 2005). Crucial to this is the concept of 'neuroplasticity', which refers to the brain's ability to reorganise itself by forming new neural connections throughout life. Understanding this aspect of brain development can significantly impact how teachers approach instruction, recognising the brain's capacity for change and growth (Thomas and Johnson, 2008).

 

Teaching Techniques for Teachers and Students

Teachers and students alike can adopt numerous strategies to facilitate effective learning. Techniques such as direct instruction, cooperative learning, inquiry-based learning, and differentiation are often employed (Rosenshine, 2012). Teachers play a crucial role in mediating students' experiences to enhance understanding and retention, while students can employ metacognitive strategies, self-regulation, and active engagement to bolster their learning.

 

Popular Learning Theories: An Examination of Kolb's Experimental Learning Theory

Among the various learning theories, Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory (ELT) holds prominence. Kolb (1984) posits that learning is a process involving four stages: concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualisation, and active experimentation. Learners cycle through these stages, gaining knowledge from experience, then reflecting, conceptualising, and experimenting with this newfound knowledge (Kolb, 1984).

 

Several studies support Kolb's theory, highlighting its application across disciplines (Kolb and Kolb, 2005; Lisko and O'Dell, 2010; Yilmaz, 2016). However, some critique it for not adequately addressing the social and cultural contexts of learning (Vygotsky, 1978), and its overemphasis on learning styles, which recent evidence suggests are not as impactful as initially thought (Pashler et al., 2008).

 

Evolution and Evaluation of Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory

David A. Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory (ELT) represents a landmark contribution to the field of educational psychology. First introduced in the 1980s, the theory has been influential in shaping our understanding of how individuals learn from their experiences. Over the years, ELT has undergone a series of refinements, spurred by empirical research and theoretical critique (Kolb, 2014).

 

Kolb's Original Experiential Learning Theory

Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory, as outlined in his seminal 1984 work, posits that learning is a process where knowledge is created through the transformation of experience. This process, according to Kolb, consists of four cyclical stages: concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualisation, and active experimentation (Kolb, 1984).

 

Concrete experience involves direct participation in an event or activity. Reflective observation entails stepping back from the experience to consider it from different perspectives. Abstract conceptualisation involves making sense of the experience by developing theories or ideas, while active experimentation involves applying the theories or ideas to new situations.

 

The Development of ELT Over the Years

Since its inception, Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory has undergone several refinements and extensions. In response to early critiques of the model's simplicity (Jarvis, 1987), Kolb and his collaborators have sought to further clarify and enrich the concept of experiential learning.

 

In subsequent versions of the model, Kolb (2014) has emphasised that learning is a holistic process that involves thinking, feeling, perceiving, and behaving. He expanded his original model to include four learning styles that correspond to the four stages of the learning cycle: converging, diverging, assimilating, and accommodating.

 

These developments have aimed to incorporate more complexity into the theory, accounting for individual differences in learning and the contextual factors that can influence the learning process.

 

Evaluation of Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory

Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory has been widely applied in various fields, such as education, psychology, and management, indicating its broad relevance and utility (Kolb and Kolb, 2005). Moreover, numerous empirical studies support the validity of ELT's basic premises (Kayes, 2002).

 

However, the theory has not been without critique. Some researchers have questioned the rigidity of the four-stage learning cycle, arguing that learning might not always follow this strict sequence (Jarvis, 1987). Others have suggested that the learning styles proposed by Kolb may not be mutually exclusive and that individuals might use multiple styles depending on the situation (Coffield, Moseley, Hall, and Ecclestone, 2004).

 

Nonetheless, these critiques have not detracted from the overall impact and importance of ELT. The theory continues to be influential, informing both pedagogical practices and research in educational psychology.

 

Effective Strategies for Language Learning

The journey of learning a new language can be a challenging yet rewarding process. Recent research has underscored the importance of several strategies that can facilitate and accelerate this process, providing language learners with the necessary tools to achieve proficiency (Macaro, 2006).

 

Engaging with the Language in Context

Immersing oneself in the language, through exposure to native speakers and authentic texts, is crucial for language acquisition (Krashen, 1982). This provides learners with a rich source of meaningful input, exposes them to the natural rhythm and intonation of the language, and offers context for the usage of vocabulary and grammar structures (VanPatten and Williams, 2007).

 

Practice Speaking from Day One

Many language learners focus on reading and listening, often neglecting speaking. However, research highlights the importance of practicing speaking skills from the outset. Engaging in conversation, even if with limited vocabulary, helps learners think in the new language and improve their pronunciation and fluency (Nation and Newton, 2009).

 

Vocabulary Learning Strategies

Vocabulary forms the backbone of a language. Effective strategies for vocabulary learning include the use of flashcards for spaced repetition (Nation, 2006), learning words in context to understand their usage (Schmitt, 2008), and using mnemonic techniques to remember new words (Campos, Amor, and González, 2018).

 

Regular and Consistent Practice

As with any new skill, consistency and regular practice are key in language learning. Research suggests that short, daily study sessions are more effective than less frequent, longer sessions, a principle known as the spacing effect (Cepeda, Pashler, Vul, Wixted, and Rohrer, 2006).

 

Employing Metacognitive Strategies

Metacognitive strategies, such as self-monitoring and self-evaluation, can be instrumental in language learning. These strategies involve reflecting on one's own learning process, identifying weaknesses and strengths, and adapting learning methods accordingly (Vandergrift and Goh, 2012).

 

Day Routine, Habits and Learning Efficiency

The role of day-to-day routines and habits cannot be underestimated when it comes to effective learning. Establishing an efficient daily schedule, developing constructive habits, and avoiding common pitfalls can significantly influence the learning process (Duke and Pearson, 2002).

 

Beneficial Habits and Routines for Learning

Certain habits and routines have been consistently linked with improved learning efficiency. Starting with a consistent sleep schedule, numerous studies highlight the importance of sufficient, quality sleep for optimal cognitive performance, memory consolidation, and general well-being (Walker, 2008; Gruber et al., 2012).

 

Another beneficial routine is regular physical activity. Exercise has been shown to boost brain function, improve concentration, and enhance mood, all of which contribute to effective learning (Tomporowski et al., 2011).

 

Furthermore, allocating specific times for focused learning and taking regular, short breaks – often referred to as the Pomodoro Technique – can increase productivity, maintain concentration and reduce the fatigue associated with long study sessions (Cirillo, 2018).

 

Lastly, maintaining a balanced diet can not only boost physical health but also significantly affect cognitive performance and learning capacity (Gómez-Pinilla, 2008).

 

Detrimental Habits and Mistakes in Learning

Conversely, certain habits and routines can be detrimental to learning. The most prevalent of these is arguably the last-minute 'cramming' approach, often employed by students around exam periods. This approach, although popular, is less effective in the long-term retention of information compared to regular, incremental study (Roediger and Karpicke, 2006).

 

Similarly, multitasking, while often seen as a valuable skill, has been shown to decrease learning efficiency as it can lead to lower concentration and comprehension (Ophir et al., 2009).

 

Another detrimental habit includes skimping on sleep in order to study. Sleep deprivation negatively impacts memory, attention, and overall cognitive function, undermining the learning process (Alhola and Polo-Kantola, 2007).

 

Implementation of beneficial habits and routines and the avoidance of detrimental ones can significantly impact the efficiency of learning. Regular sleep, exercise, focused learning sessions, and a balanced diet can support learning, while practices such as cramming, multitasking, and sleep deprivation should be avoided.

 

The Latest in Learning and Teaching Research

The field of educational psychology is continuously evolving, influenced by the advent of new research studies that explore various dimensions of learning and teaching. This body of research is vast and multifaceted, highlighting the complexity of learning processes and the factors that contribute to academic achievement.

 

Impact of Learning Environments

The environment in which learning occurs has a profound impact on educational outcomes. Research has increasingly focused on how physical spaces, social contexts, and cultural norms in a learning environment influence cognitive processes and student engagement (Kaplan and Kaplan, 1989; Higgins, Hall, Wall, Woolner, and McCaughey, 2005; Ozturk and Atalay, 2020).

 

Moreover, recent studies have emphasised the value of 'active learning environments' where students participate in interactive, collaborative, and problem-based activities, demonstrating significant gains in learning outcomes compared to traditional, lecture-based settings (Freeman et al., 2014; Stoltzfus and Libarkin, 2016; Theobald et al., 2020).

 

The Role of Digital Technology in Learning

Digital technology is another frontier that has attracted significant attention in contemporary educational psychology research. The integration of technology in education can facilitate personalised learning, improve engagement, and extend learning beyond the physical boundaries of a classroom (Hattie and Yates, 2013; Siemens, 2014).

 

However, despite the perceived benefits, the transition to digital learning environments presents unique challenges. Concerns about digital divides, privacy, and the potential for increased distraction necessitate careful planning and management (Bulger, 2016; Selwyn, 2016; Orben, Dienlin, and Przybylski, 2019). Notably, the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the transition to online learning, making this an active area of current research (Reimers and Schleicher, 2020).

 

Motivation, Emotion, and Cognition in Academic Achievement

Increasingly, research is recognising the interplay between motivation, emotion, and cognition in influencing academic achievement. Students' beliefs about their abilities (self-efficacy), their values, and their goals can significantly impact their learning motivation and, consequently, their academic performance (Schunk and Pajares, 2009; Eccles and Wigfield, 2020).

 

Simultaneously, emotions, both positive and negative, can mediate the relationship between motivation and learning. Positive emotions like enjoyment and pride can enhance motivation, while negative emotions like anxiety and boredom can hinder learning (Pekrun and Linnenbrink-Garcia, 2014; D'Mello and Graesser, 2012). Recent studies also suggest that metacognitive strategies, such as self-regulated learning and growth mindset, can help students manage their emotions and stay motivated, leading to better learning outcomes (Dweck, 2006; Zepeda, Richey, Ronevich, and Nokes-Malach, 2015).

 

Latest research in learning and teaching continuously reshapes our understanding of educational psychology, enabling us to develop more effective and personalised learning strategies. Whether it's examining the influence of learning environments, the role of digital technology, or the interplay between motivation, emotion, and cognition, each strand of research contributes to our evolving understanding of the best practices in education.

 

 

Manipulation, Deep Relaxation and their Implications in Learning

Manipulation and deep relaxation are two distinctive strategies with potential implications in learning and educational contexts. Their applications, benefits, and drawbacks vary widely, making them intriguing topics in the field of educational psychology.

 

Manipulation in Learning

Manipulation in learning refers to the process of intentionally influencing learners' behaviour, perceptions, or beliefs to guide them towards certain learning outcomes. This form of influence can take several forms, such as direct instruction, prompting, feedback, and shaping, which can be employed strategically to optimise learning (Lemov, 2015).

 

On the one hand, this manipulation can have positive effects, such as aligning the learners' actions with educational goals, reinforcing desired behaviours, and making learning more effective (Hattie and Timperley, 2007). In a more complex form, manipulation might involve shaping learners' belief systems about their ability to learn, a concept known as fostering 'growth mindset' (Dweck, 2006).

 

On the other hand, the ethical implications of manipulation in learning are a topic of ongoing debate. Critics argue that manipulation, particularly when learners are unaware of it, may lead to an imbalance of power and limit learners' autonomy (Giroux, 2010). This highlights the importance of transparency, consent, and ethical considerations in employing manipulation strategies (Aveling, 2019).

 

Deep Relaxation Techniques in Learning

Deep relaxation techniques, such as mindfulness and yoga, are emerging as promising strategies to enhance learning. These techniques are believed to help reduce stress, improve concentration, and boost cognitive function (Kauts and Sharma, 2009).

 

Mindfulness, defined as non-judgemental attention to the present moment, has been linked to improvements in attention, memory, and emotional regulation, which can enhance academic performance (Zenner, Herrnleben-Kurz, and Walach, 2014; Tang, Hölzel, and Posner, 2015). In addition, mindfulness can foster resilience to stress, a common detriment to learning (Regehr, Glancy, and Pitts, 2013).

 

Yoga, a practice that combines physical postures, breathing exercises, and meditation, is another technique gaining traction in education. Research has shown that yoga can reduce stress, improve self-esteem, and boost academic performance (Noggle, Steiner, Minami, and Khalsa, 2012). Furthermore, yoga may promote neuroplasticity, which has important implications for learning and cognitive development (Gothe, Khan, Hayes, Erlenbach, and Damoiseaux, 2019).

 

Despite the promise of these techniques, the quality of existing studies varies, and more rigorous research is needed to firmly establish their effects and mechanisms of action (Roeser and Peck, 2009). The implementation of mindfulness and yoga in education should also be done with sensitivity to individual and cultural differences (Cook-Cottone, 2016).

 

Manipulation and deep relaxation techniques offer potential benefits and challenges in educational settings. Rigorous research and ethical considerations will continue to shape their application in facilitating effective learning.

 

The Role of Technology in Enhancing Learning: Neurofeedback

Neurofeedback, an innovative technique, employs real-time displays of brain activity to teach self-regulation of brain functions. It has been used to improve attention, cognitive performance, and behavioural disorders (Gruzelier, 2014). Further research is warranted to fully understand its potential and applicability in educational contexts.

 

Hypnosis and Self-Hypnosis in Learning: Potential and Implementation

The fascinating realm of hypnosis and self-hypnosis presents an intriguing field of research within educational psychology, with various studies probing their potential as tools for enhancing learning (Wagstaff et al., 2011). These approaches aim to induce a trance-like state of heightened focus and suggestibility, which can be potentially tapped into to optimise learning processes.

 

Hypnosis is increasingly recognised for its efficacy in improving key cognitive attributes, such as concentration, memory, and motivation. As Kirsch et al. (2013) and Lynn et al. (2015) point out, these cognitive enhancements can lead to better academic performance. The mechanism behind this improvement is purportedly related to the hypnotic state's capacity to limit external distractions and promote intense concentration, which paves the way for effective learning (Raz, 2004).

 

Memory, another key component of learning, can be significantly improved under hypnosis. Several studies suggest that hypnosis might enhance memory retrieval and reduce the effects of interference (Nash, 2001). Notably, however, this effect seems to be more significant with regards to learning new information, rather than recalling previously stored information (Bäckström et al., 2018).

 

Additionally, hypnosis has been suggested to enhance motivation in learning contexts. This claim was substantiated by researchers who found that hypnosis can create a mental framework that fosters motivation by aligning personal goals and academic pursuits (Stafrace, 2012).

 

Self-hypnosis, a derivative of hypnosis, equips learners with techniques to control their own mental states. The primary benefit of this self-administered process is that it allows individuals to access hypnosis's benefits independently, potentially yielding a long-term, cost-effective learning tool (Echterling and Whalen, 1995). Self-hypnosis can help manage stress by promoting relaxation and creating a mental state conducive to learning (Alladin, 2016).

 

While hypnosis and self-hypnosis are still under-explored in an educational context, the potential benefits are promising. Further research can offer more clarity and potentially lead to innovative interventions that optimise learning.

Conclusion

Educational psychology, through its understanding of the human brain, learning theories, teaching techniques, and the integration of new research and technologies, continually evolves to meet the diverse needs of learners. It recognises that learning is a complex process shaped by numerous factors and that a one-size-fits-all approach is ineffective. As technology and research advance, educational psychology will continue to play a pivotal role in fostering effective learning and teaching.

Dr Robert Becker, FCMA, Neuropsychologist, Educational and Cognitive Psychologist, Academic Professor

References

Alhola, P., and Polo-Kantola, P. (2007). Sleep deprivation: Impact on cognitive performance. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 3(5), 553–567.

Alladin, A. (2016). Cognitive hypnotherapy for accessing and healing emotional injuries for anxiety disorders. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 59(1), 24-46.

Aveling, N. (2019). Ethical considerations for research with children and young people. In N. Kucirkova & G. Falloon (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Learning with Technology in Early Childhood, 56-68. Routledge.

Bäckström, M., Johansson, M., and Juslin, P. (2018). Effects of suppression, acceptance and spontaneous regulation on emotional reactions and memory. Cognition and Emotion, 32(6), 1198–1210.

Blakemore, S.J., Frith, U. (2005). The Learning Brain: Lessons for Education. Blackwell Publishing.

Bulger, M. (2016). Personalized learning: The conversations we’re not having. Data & Society.

Campos, A., Amor, A., and González, M.A. (2018). Memory and mnemonic techniques: From the past to the future. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 5(1), 166-174.

Cepeda, N.J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J.T., and Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354.

Cirillo, F. (2018). The Pomodoro Technique: The Acclaimed Time-Management System That Has Transformed How We Work. Currency.

Cook-Cottone, C. (2016). Mindfulness and yoga in schools: A guide for teachers and practitioners. Routledge.

D'Mello, S., and Graesser, A. (2012). Dynamics of affective states during complex learning. Learning and Instruction, 22(2), 145-157.

Duke, N., and Pearson, P.D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In What Research Has to Say About Reading Instruction, 205-242. International Reading Association.

Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.

Echterling, L.G., and Whalen, J. (1995). Stage hypnosis and self-hypnosis: a brief course for undergraduate students. Teaching of Psychology, 22(1), 34-36.

Eccles, J.S., Wigfield, A. (2020). From Expectancy-Value Theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101859.

Freeman, S., Eddy, S.L., McDonough, M., Smith, M.K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., and Wenderoth, M.P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415.

Giroux, H.A. (2010). Rethinking education as the practice of freedom: Paulo Freire and the promise of critical pedagogy. Policy Futures in Education, 8(6), 715-721.

Lutz, A., Jha, A.P., Dunne, J.D., and Saron, C.D. (2015). Investigating the phenomenological matrix of mindfulness-related practices from a neurocognitive perspective. American Psychologist, 70(7), 632.

Marsh, E.J., and Butler, A.C. (2013). Memory playgrounds: helping students to build, not block, memories. In D.B. Daniel & J.T. Willingham (Eds.), Applying Science of Learning in Education: Infusing Psychological Science into the Curriculum, 115-122. Society for the Teaching of Psychology.

Mayer, R.E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 226-232.

McNamara, D.S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N.B., and Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14(1), 1-43.

Mestre, J.P., Ross, B.H., Brookes, D.T., Smith, M.A., Treagust, D.F., and Cheema, A. (2018). Knowledge Integration in STEM: Transferring Knowledge Across Contexts and Scales of Learning. Educational Psychologist, 53(2), 110-134.

Oakhill, J.V., Hartt, J.K., and Samols, D. (2005). Levels of comprehension monitoring and working memory in good and poor comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 18(7-9), 657-686.

Paas, F., Renkl, A., and Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive Load Theory: Instructional Implications of the Interaction between Information Structures and Cognitive Architecture. Instructional Science, 32(1-2), 1-8.

Panadero, E. (2017). A Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422.

Roediger, H.L., and Karpicke, J.D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249-255.

Schunk, D.H., and Zimmerman, B.J. (1997). Social origins of self-regulatory competence. Educational Psychologist, 32(4), 195-208.

Söderlund, G.B.W., Sikström, S., Loftesnes, J.M., and Sonuga-Barke, E.J. (2010). The effects of background white noise on memory performance in inattentive school children. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 6, 55.

Stahl, S.A., Hynd, C.R., Britton, B.K., McNish, M.M., and Bosquet, D. (1996). What happens when students read multiple source documents in history? Reading Research Quarterly, 31(4), 430-456.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Watkins, P. (2014). The therapeutic use of prolonged exposure and d-cycloserine in a veteran with PTSD: a case study. Journal of Psychology & Psychotherapy, 4(2), 131.

Weinstein, Y., Madan, C.R., and Sumeracki, M.A. (2018). Teaching the science of learning. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 3(2), 2.

Willis, J. (2006). Research-Based Strategies To Ignite Student Learning: Insights from a Neurologist and Classroom Teacher. ASCD.

Yeh, S.S., Raver, C.C., and Wigfield, A. (2021). Socioemotional contexts of learning and achievement. Handbook of Educational Psychology, 3, 323-344.

Zemelman, S., Daniels, H., and Hyde, A. (2012). Best practice: Bringing standards to life in America's classrooms. Heinemann.